Beginning OF Covid
Beginning Of Covid: Here Is The History - You Decide
Beginning Of Covid: Initial communication regarding the origins and spread of COVID-19 did contain significant gaps and, at times, incomplete information. In late 2019 and early 2020, information on the virus’s origin and early cases in Wuhan was limited, with reports later indicating delays and underreporting in releasing case numbers and epidemiological data. Chinese officials initially suggested that there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission, despite signs to the contrary, which delayed the global response and led to significant scrutiny.
The COVID-19 pandemic overlapped with Hong Kong’s 2019-2020 pro-democracy protests, and there is evidence that China used the pandemic’s disruptions to strengthen control over Hong Kong and suppress opposition activities. The Hong Kong protests began in response to an extradition bill and evolved into a larger movement calling for democratic freedoms and autonomy from Beijing. Protesters often adopted yellow vests, inspired by movements like the “Yellow Vest” protests in France, symbolizing resistance against perceived government overreach.
In early 2020, as COVID-19 spread globally, the Hong Kong government, with Beijing’s support, implemented strict lockdown measures, curtailing public gatherings under the guise of health safety. This effectively limited the ability of protesters to organize, and many large-scale protests were disrupted or canceled due to restrictions on gatherings. Critics argued that pandemic-related restrictions were disproportionately enforced on pro-democracy groups, as pro-Beijing rallies and events faced fewer limitation
Beginning Of Covid: The WHO acted as a central body for collecting and disseminating information globally. On December 31, 2019, the WHO received initial reports of a “viral pneumonia” in Wuhan, China, and by January 30, 2020, it declared the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). The WHO issued guidelines on testing, public health measures, and later on vaccine distribution. However, its initial hesitation to declare a pandemic and reliance on information provided by Chinese authorities attracted criticism. WHO’s leadership, including Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, also faced scrutiny for not pushing harder for more immediate data transparency from China.
Could It Be That China Used Covid To Get Rid Of The Yellow Vest And Trump?
In the beginning of covid, China also took legislative actions during the pandemic, including the enactment of the National Security Law in June 2020. This law criminalized acts of secession, subversion, and collusion with foreign entities, which allowed authorities to arrest and prosecute protest leaders and activists more easily. The timing of these moves, amid reduced global attention due to the pandemic, raised concerns that China used the health crisis to intensify control and silence opposition in Hong Kong. By leveraging pandemic-related restrictions and legal reforms, Beijing succeeded in largely quelling the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) had a notable but often misunderstood role concerning the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and research related to coronaviruses. Here’s a summary of their involvement:
Funding for Research: The NIH, specifically the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, provided funding for research that involved the WIV. Between 2014 and 2019, the NIH awarded a grant to EcoHealth Alliance, which included funds for studies at the WIV focusing on bat coronaviruses. This collaboration was aimed at understanding and preventing potential zoonotic outbreaks.
China’s influence on the World Health Organization (WHO) has been a topic of debate, especially following the early response to COVID-19. China, as a significant financial contributor and an influential UN member, has a degree of influence over WHO operations, similar to the influence other major member states exert. Here’s how this influence plays out:
WHO Funding Structure: WHO relies on funding from member states and private donors, with the United States, China, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation being among the top funders. China’s contribution to the WHO’s budget has grown in recent years, though it still lags behind contributions from the U.S. and some other Western countries. Financial contributions can impact influence, but WHO’s main decisions are theoretically made by member state consensus.
Leadership and Policy Influence: Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, was elected with support from various nations, including China. His handling of the COVID-19 pandemic raised concerns in Western countries that WHO’s early response, including delays in declaring a public health emergency, was unduly influenced by China’s information-sharing practices. Some analysts argue that WHO leaders may be cautious in critiquing China due to the risk of losing access to data from China or creating tensions with a key funder and member state
COVID-19 Investigations and Transparency: In 2020, the WHO launched investigations to understand COVID-19’s origins. However, the WHO faced challenges in securing unrestrained access to early data and locations in China. The WHO’s 2021 report, co-authored by Chinese experts, leaned toward zoonotic origins and faced criticism from several countries and experts who called for more independent investigations, free from any potential state influence.
While China has a level of influence within the WHO, the organization works to maintain independence by balancing inputs from all member states. However, some decisions can reflect the political landscape among powerful nations, especially in high-stakes global health matters.
House Oversight Review
House Oversight Reports
How Much Did The Vaccine Cost
- The financial impact of COVID-19 has been significant for various entities, including the NIH, WHO, and pharmaceutical companies:
Pharmaceutical Companies: Companies like Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna reported enormous profits from COVID-19 vaccines and treatments. For example:
- Pfizer earned approximately $36 billion in vaccine revenue in 2021, generating substantial profits shared with BioNTech. Together, the profits for Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna in 2021 were estimated at $34 billion before taxes.
- Moderna reported revenues between $15 billion and $18 billion for the same period, with a profit margin of about 70%
Dr. Anthony Fauci’s public health message during the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic emphasized measures like wearing masks, practicing social distancing, and vaccination to mitigate the virus’s spread. While his guidance evolved with the emergence of new data, some critics argued that early messaging was not always aligned with later scientific findings, particularly as the understanding of SARS-CoV-2 transmission improved.
For example:
Mask Guidance Evolution: Early in the pandemic, Fauci and the CDC stated that masks were unnecessary for the general public, partially due to limited evidence and a desire to conserve masks for healthcare workers. As studies confirmed airborne transmission, this guidance shifted to recommend mask usage widely.
Vaccine and Immunity Messaging: Fauci highlighted the importance of vaccination in reducing severe illness and death. However, as data emerged showing breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals, the messaging had to address waning immunity and the need for booster doses.
Initial Underestimation of Airborne Spread: Initial messaging focused on surface transmission (fomites) and did not fully recognize the significance of airborne transmission, which later proved critical in understanding COVID-19’s spread.
While Fauci’s recommendations were rooted in evolving scientific consensus, public health messaging during the pandemic faced challenges due to rapidly changing information and the need to balance caution with practicality. This created perceptions among some that the guidance was inconsistent or politically motivated.